AN ORGANIZATIONAL-LEVEL 
                TEST OF A PARTIALLY MEDIATED MODEL OF RISKY DECISION MAKING BEHAVIOR
              Phyllis 
                C. Panzano, Psychology Department, The Ohio State University, 
                1827 Neil Avenue, Columbus, OH 43210
                Robert S. Billings, Psychology Department, The Ohio State University
               
              ABSTRACT
              A field 
                study involving fifty organizations investigated whether risk 
                perception and risk propensity mediated the effects of problem 
                framing and inertia on risk taking. At the organizational-level, 
                five of seven direct effect hypotheses and both hypotheses predicting 
                mediation were supported using an objective measure of risk taking.
              INTRODUCTION
              In 
                recent years, interest has grown in the role of risky decision 
                making in formulating and shaping organizational strategy. Much 
                of this research has aimed to understand the antecedents and consequences 
                of risk taking in organizations (e.g., Bromiley) but some important 
                unanswered remain. In fact, the literature is unclear about the 
                direction of the link between some determinants and risk taking 
                and about whether the effects of some determinants are direct 
                or indirect. For example, the threat rigidity hypothesis (Staw, 
                Sandelands & Dutton, 1981) suggests a negative link between 
                threat inferences and risk taking whereas prospect theory (Kahneman 
                & Tversky, 1979) suggests the relationship is positive. Further, 
                some authors suggest there is a direct link from threat inferences 
                to risk taking (e.g., Kahneman & Tversky; Staw et al) whereas 
                others contend the link is indirect (e.g., Sitkin & Pablo, 
                1992). Recent recognition of these apparent contradictions has 
                stimulated theoretical (e.g., March & Shapira, 1992; Sitkin 
                & Pablo) and empirical (e.g., Sitkin & Weingart, 1995) 
                endeavors which take a broader view of the decision making context 
                and a more careful look at cognitive processes preceding risky 
                decision making behavior.
              Stimulated 
                by this recent work, our study is an extension of the laboratory 
                studies of Sitkin and Weingart (1995) because we test many of 
                the same hypotheses and devote considerable attention to the link 
                between frames, risk perception and risk decision making. However, 
                we expand on their work in a number of important ways. Our investigation: 
                1) is a field as opposed to a lab study, 2) uses the organization 
                as opposed to the individual as the unit of analysis (e.g., Rousseau, 
                1985), 3) employs an objective, global measure of organizational 
                risky decision making as the dependent variable rather than a 
                subjective, speculative measure, and 4) proposes that risk propensity 
                and risk perception function as partial as opposed to full mediators 
                of the effects of our antecedent variables.
              A 
                MEDIATED MODEL OF RISK TAKING BEHAVIOR BY INDIVIDUALS
              Sitkin 
                and Pablo (1992) considered research related to individual, organizational 
                and problem-related variables which traditionally have been identified 
                as direct determinants of risky decision making by individuals. 
                They concluded much of the prior research in this area is fragmented 
                and issue-oriented and, consequentially, has resulted in oversimplified, 
                direct-effect models. Further, they asserted that many of these 
                variables impact risk taking behavior indirectly through their 
                effects on risk propensity (i.e. inclination to take or avoid 
                risk) and risk perception (i.e. assessment of the risk inherent 
                in a situation). They developed a mediated-model of individual 
                risk taking behavior to guide future research which specifies 
                3 factors expected to operate through risk propensity (e.g., inertia) 
                and 6 factors expected to operate through risk perception (e.g., 
                problem framing) to impact risk taking behavior.
              Sitkin 
                and Weingart's (1995) 2 lab studies tested part of Sitkin and 
                Pablo's (1992) broader mediated model. They focused on two frequently 
                studied predictors of risky decision making, outcome history and 
                problem framing and assessed risk propensity, risk perception 
                and risky decision making. Their findings clearly suggest risk 
                propensity and risk perception should be included as mediating 
                variables in models of risky decision making behavior. 
                  
              
              
                 
                
              Research 
                Home - Page 1 | 2 | 3 
                | 4 | 5 
                |  NEXT >